The specification's consistent description of "a passive infrared detector" that is superior to those in the prior art due to its location in a wall console rather than the head unit disavows wall consoles lacking a passive infrared detector. In such situations, there is no need for express disavowal stating that placing the detector elsewhere is "impossible or even infeasible."
Read the case here.
In Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI argued that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)’s final written decision was improper on several grounds and p
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that uCloudlink is entitled to summary judgment of noninfringement after rejecting the district court’s claim construction which did not require a "n