top of page

Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (S. Ct. Dec. 11, 2019)

In a district court proceeding brought under 35 U.S.C. 145, the United States Patent and Trademark Office cannot recover the pro rata salaries of attorneys and a paralegal, and each litigant pays its own attorneys' fees "win or lose, unless a statute or contract provides otherwise" in accordance with the 'American rule' (i.e., the presumption against fee shifting).

Read the case here.

Recent Posts

See All

U.S. Supreme Court opinion of Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi

Post by Paul Serbinowski What must the specification disclose to enable broad functional claim language? A week ago in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, the U.S. Supreme Court considered what the specification mu


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page