top of page

Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Gemalto M2M GmbH et al. (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2019)

In a patent that describes a device and improved method for error detection in data transmission systems, a dependent claim recited a specific implementation of varying the way check data is generated that improves the ability of prior art detection systems. Specifically, dependent claims 2-4 required that a "varying device" "modify the permutation in time." This improvement was akin to the type of non-abstract improvement the Court found to be patent eligible under 35 USC 101.

Read the case here.

Recent Posts

See All

U.S. Supreme Court opinion of Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi

Post by Paul Serbinowski What must the specification disclose to enable broad functional claim language? A week ago in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, the U.S. Supreme Court considered what the specification mu


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page