The specification's consistent description of "a passive infrared detector" that is superior to those in the prior art due to its location in a wall console rather than the head unit disavows wall consoles lacking a passive infrared detector. In such situations, there is no need for express disavowal stating that placing the detector elsewhere is "impossible or even infeasible."
Read the case here.
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that uCloudlink is entitled to summary judgment of noninfringement after rejecting the...
The United States Patent and Trademark Office announced that changes to the rule pertaining to government use licenses and the small...
In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020), the Court of Appeals...
Comentarios