검색

An Invention by a Machine (App. No. 16/524,350)

In dismissing a petition filed against a decision refusing to vacate the Notice to File Missing Parts of a Nonprovisional Application listing a machine named "DABUS" as the inventor, the United States Patent and Trademark Office held that an "inventor" must be a natural person and cannot encompass machines (e.g., neural networks).

Read the decision here.

#inventor #Artificialintelligence #naturalperson

최근 게시물

전체 보기

SIMO Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology, Ltd. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 5, 2021)

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that uCloudlink is entitled to summary judgment of noninfringement after rejecting the district court’s claim construction which did not require a "n

USPTO introduces rule changes pertaining to small entity status

The United States Patent and Trademark Office announced that changes to the rule pertaining to government use licenses and the small entity status for paying discounted patent fees will go into effect

SIPCO, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co. (Fed. Cir., Nov. 17, 2020)

In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, on remand, that it is precluded fr